| To: | Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates |
| From: | Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
| Reply-to: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:17:21 +0000 (UTC) |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
>On Thu,11/26/2015 8:13 PM, Radio K0HB wrote: >Humbling. That's all. Humbling! >WRONG. Those high rates simply show well equipped stations with good operators >who, by virtue of their >LOCATIONS and the SCORING RULES, are really IN the >contest. >73, Jim K9YC So if you were to have operated from a good station in an advantageous location you would have won this last weekend? RIGHT. Silly me for having one second imagined otherwise... 73 Roger VE3ZI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", kr2q |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Polyglot contesting, Art Boyars |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Is it time that the contest sponsors officially identify SCP as "assisted?", kr2q |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW High Rates, john@kk9a.com |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |