To the OP that flamed Jim for not 100% QSLing
hmmm....... My nickles worth
while I believe in a bit different QSL practice ( I try and reciprocate
expediently) to anyone that sends me an SASE or a dollar bill via snail mail
Do I enjoy replying to snail mail QSLs, hell no !!!
I would encourage you to be in a guy like Jim's shoes
#1 he shares a hell of a lot of his time with other amateur ops in other
ways
he has mentored many, both on and off the air
While I do not know Jim personally, he has helped me many times
with his excellent info of RFI, Torrid use, RF choking, grounding versus
bonding etc
#2 for many of us including myself (even though I still do reply to snail
mail cards)
reply of QSL by US mail sucks !!!
why, it is so much of an out dated method, it waste time and resources
for many business professionals Time = Money
#3 a possible solution........
QSL Via the Buro for everything
If you work ON4UN you will get a card via the Buro
regardless if you have an eqsl or lotw qsl from him
I think I have a card from John for every hf band
I am sure he uses in shack automation to do these
cause he is a very busy guy.
AND yes many ops do not have envelopes at their BURO
and guess what, those uncollected cards go in the Heaven forbid Trash can
Oh My !
And please remember that using ARRL LOTW is supporting the ARRL
which is a good thing in my book
Besides you get fast credits for the contact if the other station is
uploading to LOTW
Are you having issues getting LOTW set up
simple call the league for help they will walk you thru it, but better yet
read the FAQ PDF on the site first
Speaking of QSLing which is of course a bit off the original topic btw
How many are not embracing the use of http://ClubLog.org ???
By the way I also feel real hams sign their call and the end of
email discussions, along with their name
but guess what, Doug,
that is a personal thing :)
IOW Lighten up !
Cheers!
Steve
KG5VK
http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net> wrote:
> By your own admission you will not send a QSL to anyone who is not on the
> LoTW. You have posted recently on this list (Aug. 6 & 9) that someone who
> sends you a QSL with return support will not get a QSL card in return. You
> will keep the support and round file the QSL card. That is disrespectful
> amongst other things and certainly NOT 100% QSLing. Maybe it is time to
> suggest that anyone receiving a card from K9YC treat his card the same way
> he would treat your card.
>
> Doug
>
> I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> All of my logs since getting back on the air in 2003 are on both LOTW
> and eQSL, including logs for contests using other calls. That's 100%
> QSLing on my part.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> On Tue,10/27/2015 7:20 PM, Doug Renwick wrote:
> > It's good to see that you are getting some of your own medicine on not
> > QSLing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|