CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

To: w1rm@comcast.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques
From: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 12:36:33 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
I guess that depends how much time the sponsors  have to run them down.  In 
addition to checking whether Unassisted types  are cheating.  And who has 
bad signals and should be DQed.  Same for  power cheaters.  And ghost ops.  
What have I left out?
 
After a while that could become a real 80 hour a  week job.
 
73,
Ken, AB1J

 
 
In a message dated 9/6/2015 15:10:03 GMT Standard Time, w1rm@comcast.net  
writes:

I would  argue that just because the call is unique, doesn't automatically 
mean it's  broken and warrants further investigation.


Pete,  W1RM


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>