He is not active now. LY1DS oro LY6M.
Some 20-25 years ago.
73 Sam
2015 rugp. 16 23:02 "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de> rašė:
> We all know that the number of qtc is more important then the number of
> qsos.
>
> But as I see in the pdf you were not active on 80m only as expected.
> And the 80m multiplier points are just a third of the total.
>
> I would not name that only 80m dipole when you worked all bands.
>
> A dipole fed by open wire is a multi band antenna.
> When high in the sky it will beat yagis at moderate heights for sure.
>
> Who were the other guys you mentioned using only a 80m antenna?
>
> 73
> Peter
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saulius Zalnerauskas [mailto:ly5w.sam@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sonntag, 16. August 2015 21:15
> To: Peter Voelpel
> Cc: Cq-Contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics
>
> I had only one (1) antenna - 80m Dipole
>
> http://www.darc.de/uploads/media/waedc94c.pdf
> http://www.darc.de/uploads/media/waedc94s.pdf
>
>
> Sam LY5W ex LY1DR
>
> QTC is main in WAEDC, not QSO
>
>
> 21:16 "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de> rašė:
>
>
> Which years happened that?
> Can´t find those top 10 winners with their single 80m antenna in
> the
> result
> listings...
>
> 73
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of
> Saulius Zalnerauskas
>
> Look to history results of WAE.
> To win SOp You must win Lithuania first!
>
> I know guys which were in Top Ten with only one (1) antenna- 80m
> dipole!
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|