CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2018] Standings, CQ WPX CW claimed scores added ad

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2018] Standings, CQ WPX CW claimed scores added ad
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:29:43 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Many of us like to write a story about our operation with our 3830 post,
especially if it is an expedition. I am certainly not going to do this
within an hour of a 48 hour contest.  There is more to 3830 than just
scores.

John KK9A


To:     <wrtc2018@lists.wrtc2018.de>
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2018] Standings,  CQ WPX CW claimed
scores added addendum
From:   "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:11:06 -0300

As much as I would really like to see all scores (and comments) (for WRTC
and 
non-WRTC scoring contests) posted by fellas within an hour of the contest
end 
to 3830, I will not fool myself into thinking everyone will do that.

Not even MOST ops will post to 3830, thus, if the WRTC 2018 committee uses
3830 
claims for tentative scoring, they will sadly be quite incomplete.  Even one

top scoring op not posting will skew the results, so

what is the gain?

 

Mike VE9AA

 

Mike, Coreen & Corey

Keswick Ridge, NB

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] [WRTC2018] Standings, CQ WPX CW claimed scores added ad, john <=