CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field and Geography

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field and Geography
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:23:50 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There already is a zone 3 plaque in CQWW.  Perhaps your club could sponsor
more such as zone 3 LP and assisted?

John KK9A

To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field and Geography
From:   Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to:       k9yc@arrl.net
Date:   Mon, 25 May 2015 19:48:07 -0700


That's because the scoring rules are far less out of whack. Clubs and
individual in most areas are actually full competitors in the same
contest! There has, for example, been a long-standing rivalry between
PVRC, SMC, and NCCC, and each club puts wins on the board depending on how
seriously they take it. There's also great competition among small and
medium-sized clubs. Ditto for NAQP and NA Sprint.

73, Jim K9YC

 On Mon,5/25/2015 7:22 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
What about the Sweepstakes contests?  I have not read any complaints about
the lack of high scores from the Atlantic/East Coast.


Top five SO for 2014 CW
N9RV                232,898
W7RN (N6TV, op)   224,930
N2IC/5            213,974
N2NT (N2NC, op) 212,148
NR5M (K5GA, op)   210,156

Top five SO for 2014 SSB
W7WA                369,018
N9RV (K5TR, op) 351,256
K5TA            332,332
K6NA (N6ED, op) 325,028
AA5B                308,594


73,
John KK9A

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>