Felipe, With all due respect to your unique position I would think that
many would like to know what kind of antenna design devised by anyone,
even Eric NP3A "with a degree of antenna design" extant that could
produce an equal signal here at my QTH with the claimed 4.7 watts to
NP4A's 1500 watts. This would require an antenna capable of producing
25 db gain. Since my QTH is 125 miles SE of KP4 I would assume that
this supper antenna at KP4KE had an omni-directional pattern. If you
know of such an 160 meter antenna design that is capable of producing
320 times the power, or 25 db gain, it would be worth millions in the
communications and broadcast industry. The claim that KP4KE's "double
bazooka" was capable of such performance when his 160 meter QRP "record"
was achieved defies all known existing laws of physics. As you stated
"our approach has to be scientific and fair for KP4KE" so why not
explain to me what antenna known anywhere in the world is capable of
developing this kind of gain. The picture KP4KE has published on
QRZ.com shows only a modest installation compared to that of Pedro,
NP4A. At some point we can all benefit by knowing of an antenna design
capable of developing 25db omni- directional gain on 160 meters if such
an antenna actually exists. You indeed have peaked my curiosity on this
subject.
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
On 5/16/2015 12:56 PM, Felipe J. Hernández wrote:
Herb
It is not about changing the op, in this case Eric is an acomplished
Rf engineer and contester, with a degree of antenna design and lots of
experience in terrain modeling.
So the perspective of an operator with that profile could shed
significant light on the overal station performance, since certain
QTH's have an advantage over others as well as other antennas also
bring that extra db, that can create an overrall better performance of
the station.
If we are going to stay true to our intention, our approach has to
be scientific and fair for KP4KE.. the information about his previous
operations is certainly valid and the committee
Im sure is considering it and has considered it, since I believe he
has already been DQ for power claims. Im sure there will be enought
ways to compare during the contest.
How much these records make sense can easily be easily analized by
looking at other zone 7 and 8 QRP stations in the past, but I think
thats another discussion...
Lets wait if his commitment stands, he has failed his commitments
before..
Felipe
NP4Z
El sábado, 16 de mayo de 2015, Herbert Schoenbohm
<herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com <mailto:herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>>
escribió:
Felipe,
I don't know how just changing the operator will prove anything at
all. What I know to a moral certainty is the comparison on KP4TE
alleged QRP signal on ground wave and that of NP4A's full power
signal from a great location with a superb antenna system at the
same time. This proved to me that KP4KE's claim of running "4.7
watts to a double bazooka" when he established his published
record that his QRP" entry was totally bogus. The signal
measurements made here of the two stations in comparison do not lie.
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
On 5/16/2015 8:03 AM, Felipe J. Hernández wrote:
To address Herb's comments:
We had an honest conversation with kp4ke regarding the
questions around his
qrp and other operations.
HE has agreed to allow ERic Np3a to operate his station and
to show the
world how his station performs in qrp, the official date set
by him was on
wpx cw this year.
Certainly we are anxious as you to make sure that these were
all valid
entries, let's wait for wpx and see.
73's
Felipe
NP4Z
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:52:26 -0400
From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle
Message-ID: <5553814A.9070103@vitelcom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
There are others in the record book essentially in perpetuity.
The fact
that CQ Contesting still posts some of the biggest
malefactors, i.e. the
low band QRP world records of an infamous station in KP4, just
prevents
others from even giving such an impossible score a legitimate
challenge.
These were certainty challenged and with the adequate proof of
the fact
that the were the result of cheating. But since CQ let this
matter just
slide and didn't properly DQ, it stands as a detriment to radio
contesting for those who follow the rules and as an
encouragement to
those who don't .
Looking ahead, either we slay this beast of contesting as we
know it
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|