CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Checklog Charlie

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Checklog Charlie
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 15:01:19 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't ever see in the next decade or even more any contest sponsor requiring this. Unless they want to cut the participation level.
I know I wouldn't be able to enter

Drake TR-4  or Kenwood TS-430S

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 5/9/2015 9:34 AM, Mike Reublin NF4L wrote:
I'm missing something here. How is it the fault of the rig that xmit freq. 
isn't logged? Any modern rig is capable of supplying the frequency of both 
VFOs. It's a trivial matter for the software to request it. It just isn't 
tradition.

If the contest sponsors require it, the programmers will include it. Course 
you'd also have to know if split was on.

73, Mike NF4L
On May 9, 2015, at 7:05 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

W2LC wrote:



"Neither my radio or software is capable of logging the transmit frequency
for

me, so does that mean I can no longer submit a log for CQWW?



The software is not the big issue but the radio is. What is the cost of
adding

my transmit frequency to my log? About $5k USD for a good radio decent
filters

and other accessories. Is that the price of entry into CQWW?  Quite honestly
my

older radio still works pretty well and I do not see getting many more QSOs
due

to a new radio. The ROI would be very low.



Is it now the policy of the CQWW committee to say to older radio users "we

don't want you in this contest"?"



--------

Actually, since you already have an older radio, the cost of good clean
FT1000MP with decent filters on the used market is about $1,400.  And for
$100 you can buy virtually any contest software. So the real need is more
like $1,500 - not $5,000.



And the point of it, if required, would not be that you can't participate in
the contest and submit your log, but rather you might not be eligible for
significant awards.



I think that the separation of the 6,000+ entrants that are enjoying
themselves from the 1,000 that are truly competing would be a good thing for
the sport.  Requiring those that are actually "in it to compete and do well"
something that is completely unnecessary for the rest of the crowd is fine
if someone knows it's the "price of admission" to be a competitor.  Nothing
in this world worth competing for is cheap to play in or easy to win.  Why
should radiosport be any different?



Ed  N1UR





_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>