Scott, even if you DID buy a new radio it wouldn't make a difference.
My radio is fairly recent (FTdx-5000) and my software is very recent (N1MM+).
If I work a split, ie RX-7075/TX-7175, my log will record the Q on the RX QRG.
73, de Hans, K0HB
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:05 PM, null <w2lc@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> someone wrote "If the USA station's log does not reflect the correct
> transmitting frequency, then the log should be considered a check log. In
> this age of ham radio software being free or at a very low cost, there is no
> reasonable excuse for not indicating the transmit frequency." ... yes there is
> Neither my radio or software is capable of logging the transmit frequency for
> me, so does that mean I can no longer submit a log for CQWW?
> The software is not the big issue but the radio is. What is the cost of
> adding my transmit frequency to my log? About $5k USD for a good radio decent
> filters and other accessories. Is that the price of entry into CQWW? Quite
> honestly my older radio still works pretty well and I do not see getting many
> more QSOs due to a new radio. The ROI would be very low
> Yes Steve I am on the trailing edge of technology happily living in the 20th
> century.
> Is it now the policy of the CQWW committee to say to older radio users "we
> don't want you in this contest"?
> 73 Scott W2LC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|