Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.

[Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>]

Well given that a log analysis was done based on the totality of a log, 
there is no way to judge a log excerpt in isolation.
How about this, why don't you post the entire 48 hour video of your 
effort and we will then be able to decide without question.  Seem 
reasonable?
73 Rich NN3W

On 5/8/2015 4:52 PM, Dmitry Stashuk wrote:
> Hi, Rich.
> Just one question to you as you are S&P   expert. Can you examine this log 
> frames to check either assisted or not this entries.
> 7015 0913 LA6IHA
> 3521 0914 VP2V/DL7VOG
> 7015 0914 YL2PA
> 3529 0915 YS4U
> 3542 0916 VA7KO
> 3527 0917 8P5A
>
> 3522 0908 JA3YBK
> 3554 0909 PV8DX
>
> 14070 1733 ON6BR
> 28040 1734 VP2E
> 14070 1735 K3OSO
> 28043 1735 PY1NB
> 28022 1736 8P5A
> 28019 1737 P49Y
> 14070 1738 OL9Z
>
> 14002 2324 TI5A
> 14016 2325 LT1F
> 14032 2327 P40A
>
> More frames are available if you are interesting.
>
> Just please submit your opinion.
>
> 73's Dim UT5UGR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Исходное сообщение --------
> От: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
> Дата:08.05.2015  17:27  (GMT+02:00)
> Кому: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Тема: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.
>
> I'm not going to make any presumptions, but I noted many of the same
> issues that Ken saw.  Some very LARGE VFO swings in a matter of one or
> two minutes - and only hitting multipliers on the other radio. Having
> done a lot of S&P work, I have difficulty making a 30 KHz swing in two
> minutes on CW - and hitting multipliers as the only QSOs.
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> On 5/7/2015 6:38 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> >     
> >
> > I've looked fairly carefully at the TO7A log.
> >
> >     
> >
> > The operator is expertly interweaving QSOs using dueling CQs on two bands
> > almost the entire contest. There are a few short successful mult passes
> > where there appears to be no CQing. There are some instances of very juicy
> > mults appearing over fairly large swaths of frequencies in short time
> > periods that do raise questions. There are other periods that I feel don't
> > quite fall into that category, but others might have a differing opinion. I
> > have enumerated the ones I find might have drawn the attention of the CQWW
> > Committee and influenced their decision to issue a DQ.
> >
> >     
> >
> > IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:  What I view as potentially questionable does not
> > equate to DEFINITIVE evidence of assistance. It could be the results of a
> > great operator.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 0708 - 0710 there are three mults on 80m while running high rate on
> > another band.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 0727 - 0740 there are a lot of mults on 40m while running high rate on
> > another band.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 0934 - 0938 there are a couple of mults while running high rate on
> > another band.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 1013 - 1014 there are two mults on 15m 26 khz apart that make you wonder
> > if you can tune that fast in S&P, but it is early and there aren't many
> > signals on the band. Maybe it was professional use of a bandscope.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 1403 - 1411 there are 7 mults on 10m stretched over 50 khz. Tuning 50 khz
> > while working 7 QSOs on the run frequency in 9 minutes is impressive. Maybe
> > it was professional use of a bandscope.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 1847 - 1850 there are 3 mults on 10m over 30 khz while running on 15m.
> > Maybe it was professional use of a bandscope.
> >
> >     
> >
> > At 0903 - 0913 there is an instance of jumping off a 40m CQ frequency,
> > working a mult 12 khz away and jumping back to the CQ frequency within 3
> > minutes while working an additional 3 mults on 80m.
> >
> >     
> >
> > Again, these are simply my observations. As Steve, N2IC stated, you view the
> > log and draw your own conclusions.
> >
> >     
> >
> > 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> >     
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest