To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea |
From: | Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:02:50 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 14/04/2015 11:29, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote: And how about setting up a separate e-mail address for such reports? I'm thinking that would encourage people to report bad sigs, and would serve notice to deliberate violators that a report is just a few keystrokes away. N1MM Logger makes it very easy to annotate a log with such reports, whether or not you work the offender. There's an easier N1MM option - just spot the offenders with the comment "wide". That way, the sponsors or anyone else can check the offending signals DURING the contest. 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Bill Parry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Barry N1EU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Bill Parry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule was: Re: Suggestion for Cabrillo -- and the phone skimmer, new idea, Joe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |