CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Technology - Phone Skimmer Nears Beta Test

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Technology - Phone Skimmer Nears Beta Test
From: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 13:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There are different ways to skimmer the cat and some of them do not require 
voice recognition technology. It is entirely possible that each transmitter and 
amplifier produce a unique RF fingerprint that can reliably be used to identify 
the station. Think of it as the equivalent of the call history feature in 
loggers.  The first time you hear a station you do the call sign decoding 
yourself and for the rest of the contest that unique fingerprint of what you 
just copied could be used to populate the bandmap and the call history. Same 
concept of course applies to CW and RTTY. As a by product you gain the 
opportunity to identify fake callers.

This of course is just an example. When you focus on the outcome rather than 
the means of accomplishing the outcome the number of solutions goes up.

Rudy N2WQ
      From: K4XS via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
 To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
 Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 6:29 AM
 Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Technology - Phone Skimmer Nears Beta Test
   
On the SSB skimmers.  It will really be interesting if a voice  skimmer can 
decipher what I can't...nasty overmodulated, fuzzy crappy audio that  seems 
to be the new vogue for SSB.  Randy said it right, far too many  stations 
with nasty audio out there.
 
Jim has it right on the money.  Listen to your audio, not with  the monitor 
(although that helps).  Use a second rx.  If you don't  have one, borrow 
one.  Transmit into a dummy load.  Don't have a dummy  load, then go up on 10 
meters transmit with .1 watts late in the evening and  adjust, adjust, 
adjust.  Then listen, listen and listen.  This  is a foolproof way to have good 
audio.
 
I'm not a big fan of having someone listen to the audio since  everyone has 
a different preference for what they consider good audio.  Some like a 
nice smooth FM-radio sound and others like a clean punchy  audio.
 
When you're on the air in non-contest situations you'll know if you  have 
good audio.  You'll get non-solicited comments either pro or  con.
 
As for the settings, I run my K-3 in the general range of what K9YC  does.
 
K4XS/KH7XS
 
 
In a message dated 4/4/2015 4:16:35 A.M. Coordinated Universal Time,  
k5zd@charter.net writes:

PLEASE  -- the next time you are setting up for a SSB contest, either
> listen  to your own audio on another rig or get another ham to listen
>  critically to your audio.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


  
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>