CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Classic Assisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Classic Assisted
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:26:50 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I've already written privately to K5ZD suggesting that thisis likely the explanation - after all there is no advantage to entering as Classic Assisted/

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 10/28/2014 10:21 AM, Milt -- N5IA wrote:
I agree with Doug. My opinion is that the logging program (N1MM in particular) defaults to assisted and the person who sets up the log has to purposely select non-assisted. Then the submitter does not check the Cabrillo file before sending in the file.

Mis dos centavos, de Milt, N5IA, op at N7GP

-----Original Message----- From: kr2q@optimum.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 3:23 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Classic Assisted

Without having looked at the logs yet, it is possible that these headers are in error, since some/many
logging apps are set up to default to "assisted."

de Doug KR2Q



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8465 - Release Date: 10/27/14

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>