CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Caliphate of ISIS in CQWW SSB

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Caliphate of ISIS in CQWW SSB
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:09:12 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Hhhmm ....

I think there's an issue of timeframe here that you're missing, Hans. And it's fundamental to why the ARRL and CQ, at least in theory, defer to established institutions like the U.N. to determine the legitimacy of the local governing body. Otherwise, to take the argument to the extreme, we could have situations like some local HOA requiring their residents to use locally assigned callsigns ... and then us pretend that they were valid until the feds intervened. I'm not sure that the authority of the Caliphate of ISIS has any greater legitimacy, and hopefully no greater duration.

It seems true that CQ and ARRL can figure out how to be consistent on the issue, but I'm not sure we want to throw out the premise that callsigns need to be "valid" (whatever that may be).

By the way, I've found the argument informative thus far and find myself sympathetic to at least parts of both sides of it.

73,
Dave   AB7E




On 10/19/2014 11:07 AM, Radio K0HB wrote:
Your example isn't outrageous.


If local political conditions outside his control compel a ham to change call 
letters, then we as hams (not as Americans or Argentinians or whatever), as 
fellow HAMS, should let him play.








73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a Boy and his Radio"
            7⃣3⃣

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ken Widelitz <widelitz@gte.net> wrote:

Would those opposed to CQ Magazine's position on Crimea support the position
that the upcoming operation from the Caliphate of ISIS by a boy and his
radio with a call sign issued by the now local ruling body should count for
points and the Syria or Iraq mult depending on its exact location (or should
it be a new one?)
NOTICE: The above hypothetical question is an extreme example and is asked
for the sole purpose of being outrageous.
73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>