To: | Rex Maner <k7qq@netzero.net>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right? |
From: | Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 10:12:59 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I figure that if you know the other guy hasn't got it right.. it isn't a Q... IF you don't KNOW he doesn't have it right.. and he "QSLs".. you gotta assume he has it right.. therefore the "busted calls"... Deleting one that is wrong.. isn't a problem is it? NOT deleting one wouldbe wrong if you KNOW it isn't a Q... Guess I'm stuck in the 60's... huh? Have a great day, --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy > From: k7qq@netzero.net > To: W5OV@W5OV.COM; ww1me@roadrunner.com; cq-contest@contesting.com > Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:09:50 +0000 > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right? > > Big Question > > Do I have a valid contact if I know the information passed (NOT passed ) was > incorrect ?? > > Rex K7QQ > > > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ160ssb report, Jeff Blaine |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?, Radio K0HB |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This IS cheating, right?, Rex Maner |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CWO vs NAS, Hal Offutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |