I use fldigi for digital, which uploads directly to RUMlog if it is open, and
use MacLoggerDx for some contests. None of them upload directly to LoTW, but
do so to eQSL. However, each produces adif files. RUMlog, where everything
ends up, links with the ARRL program to provide tq8 files that I upload
manually to LoTW.
It is much easier to do than it sounds and easier to do than explain! Only one
time did a file fail to upload, but it was because of a poor internet
connection.
73, Scott AA0AA
Sent Scott's iPad
> On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> My Winlog32 does the eQSL thing automatically.. it does NOT do LOTW auto..
> far from it.
> IN FACT.. I have not been successful with LOTW in well over two years.
> IF winlog32 or any logging program.. like N1MM would do the LOTW auto.. I'd
> be plumb happy...
> and so would a whole lotta other folk too. (the ones that need a WY
> confirmation).
>
> Have a great day,
>
>
> --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:25:35 -0800
> > From: cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com; rtty@contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
> >
> > I am about 47% confirmed on LoTW and much lower on eQSL (although not
> > calculated, country list is shorter). DX (outside NA) confirms more often
> > on LoTW, and, over all, digital QSOs are confirmed much more often on eQSL.
> > NA contacts confirm more often on LoTW or both. Digital contacts are
> > confirmed overwhelmingly on eQSL.
> >
> > 73, Scott AA0AA; XE1/AA0AA
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: "Ktfrog007@aol.com" <Ktfrog007@aol.com>
> > >To: cq-contest@contesting.com; rtty@contesting.com
> > >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:49 AM
> > >Subject: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
> > >
> > >
> > >Here's my observation of relative mode confirmation rates in LoTW and
> > >eQSL:
> > >
> > >JT65 > PSK > RTTY > CW > SSB > FM
> > >
> > >It sort of goes along with computer skills and maybe age.
> > >
> > >I'm currently running 49.5% confirmed in LoTW. If I took out all the old
> > >QSOs from 1960-1999 I'd be well over 50%. I think this is remarkable and
> > >partly explains why LoTW seems to run so poorly now - it's a victim of
> > >it's
> > >own success. A lot of my confirmations come from digital and RTTY QSOs.
> > >
> > >73,
> > >Ken, AB1J
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >In a message dated 2014-02-10 8:59:24 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> > >tshoppa@wmata.com writes:
> > >
> > >Many of these QSO's are already confirmed in LOTW (hint, RTTY contesting
> > >has extremely high confirmation rates in LOTW).
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >CQ-Contest mailing list
> > >CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|