CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

from [Ken Widelitz] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "'Bob Shohet, KQ2M'" <kq2m@kq2m.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:56:58 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Hi Bob,

 

Agree entirely. You hit the nail on the head. The idea is to ID only
frequently enough to keep the pileup to just a few callers. Requiring ID's
is a good idea, but it is a time issue, not a number of QSOs issue. A once a
minute rule works for me.

 

73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT

 

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] what else is lost, Gerry Treas K8GT
Next by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] what else is lost, Ron Notarius W3WN
Previous by Thread:  [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Bob Shohet, KQ2M
Next by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened, Steve IK4WMH
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]