Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

["Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>]

Oh well...
Next step would be suggesting to slow down for those who can't copy CW well?

Yuri VE3DZ


> Some people try to COMPETE and WIN. That's why they try to maximize the
> number of contacts (aka QSOs).
>
> <snip>
>
> Expecting the S&P operator to waste 30 seconds doing nothing waiting for
> the run operator to ID is to suggest the S&P operator's time is not
> valuable - that he is not entitled to COMPETE and WIN.
>
> I note the Sprint contests have required ID with every QSO from the
> beginning. At least here in the U.S. these contests are recognized as
> *the* test of operator ability. Nobody is suggesting this rule be deleted.
> IMHO its addition to the WPX is a welcome change.
>
> ==
> Doug Smith W9WI
> Pleasant View, TN  EM66
> _________________________
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest