CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems

To: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems
From: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:02:14 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If the map at
http://ronandrachel.com/wp-content/gallery/blog-media/2011Sep01-Journal/Europe-US.pngis
accurate, and I saw many others similar to it online, then I can see a
marked difference in how EU vs US compares for point opportunities.

David - K2DSL



On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> How about zero points for W/VE – W/VE QSO’s and count US states and VE
> provinces as multipliers. Also zero points for EU-EU QSO’s and count only
> EU counties as multipliers. I mean really is a DL working a G really
> working DX ? Isn’t all the EU stations working each other (mostly on the
> low bands)  like domestic contest in the US anyway?  Too bad for all those
> EU stations I gave up in frustration trying to work from PJ4A on 160 and 80
> meters because they were happily working each other for one point QSO’s. I
> probably would have been a multiplier for them...
>
> Jeff KU8E
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>