To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Location, location, location |
From: | Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:48:01 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Possibly true, but every year is a coulda', shoulda', woulda. Thats
what makes each year unique.
Some would argue that the one year I won SOAB(U) in WW (2006), I won because K5ZD or K4ZW weren't on full time. Possibly true, but the same could be said of this year or any other year. Its who gets on and puts in the time is what matters in any given year. 73 Rich NN3W On 12/2/2013 1:01 PM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote: No disrespect intended for those fine efforts outside of the NE.... However, KQ2M was a 38 hr effort, K5ZD chose the classic as did NN1N. If any of those stations had done a serious 43+ hour effort we know who would have been 1, 2 and 3 in no specific order...followed by the guys outside the NE.N2IC....4370 170 476 46 hrsK5ZD...2889 147 441 24 hrs NN1N...2701 149 433 24 hrsLike I said, if a quality station with a good op does a serious effort inthe NE, it will beat a quality station with a good op outside the NE for WW. If no quality NE stations show up with a serious effort in a particular class, we do have a chance of winning...like your SOHP and my SOAHP. Sometimes the stars do align properly.Bill K4XS/KH7XS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems, Jack Haverty. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?, Fabio I4UFH |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Location, location, location, Cqtestk4xs |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WRTC-2018 contests that count, start date?, Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |