CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Location, location, location

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Location, location, location
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:48:01 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Possibly true, but every year is a coulda', shoulda', woulda. Thats what makes each year unique.

Some would argue that the one year I won SOAB(U) in WW (2006), I won because K5ZD or K4ZW weren't on full time. Possibly true, but the same could be said of this year or any other year.

Its who gets on and puts in the time is what matters in any given year.

73 Rich NN3W

On 12/2/2013 1:01 PM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
No disrespect intended for those fine efforts outside of the  NE....
However, KQ2M was a 38 hr effort, K5ZD chose the classic as did  NN1N.  If
any of those stations had done a serious 43+ hour effort we know  who would
have been 1, 2 and 3 in no specific order...followed by the guys  outside
the NE.
N2IC....4370 170 476 46 hrs
K5ZD...2889    147  441         24 hrs
NN1N...2701    149  433         24 hrs
Like I said, if a quality station with a good op does a serious effort in
the NE, it will beat a quality station with a good op outside the NE  for
WW.  If no quality NE stations show up with a serious effort in a  particular
class, we do have a chance of winning...like your SOHP and my  SOAHP.
Sometimes the stars do align properly.
Bill K4XS/KH7XS


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>