To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving Scoring |
From: | W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> |
Date: | Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:46:47 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Are you saying that we should not have overall winners of the contest
then? There will be no real number one?
Mike W0MU On 12/2/2013 1:56 AM, Edward Sawyer wrote: Tom Stated "Sorry Peter, but it takes a lot more than that.No matter how much hardware you have, you are not going to win from the Pacific Northwest."Sure you can. You can win Zone 3 from the Pacific Northwest and get a plaque for the win. No different than us New Englanders competing for the New England Trophy in SS or NAQP, since "you can't win" from W1.Make what is your competition more important in CQWW, and go all out for the ones that favor your area.73Ed N1UR_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?, Stan Stockton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving scoring systems, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolving Scoring, Rex Maner |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Location, location, location, Cqtestk4xs |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |