No, 3 different NEW TS590 owned.
In SO2R, next to a FT1000MP, and now SO2R FT1000MP and K3.
I love the receiver on the TS590 in the down conversion, and the DNR on the
TS590. Bud the up conversion bands, powerspikes and PEP power are worst case
scenario. In a "MULTI RADIO - MULTI OP" set up.
But hé, that is just my opinion. I could be wrong:-)
73
Steef
> Op 1 dec. 2013 om 15:48 heeft Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Yes, the TS-590 was a very worthless radio on 10 meters in CQWW CW last
> weekend:
>
> N2IC 1560 33 125 24 670,394
>
> #2 claimed score in USA. Highest QSO total of any USA.
>
> And in CQWW SSB:
>
> http://www.3830scores.com/showrumor.php?arg=u9aHzOfcivmmR
>
> #1 claimed score in USA. 1698 QSO's on 10 meters.
>
> Something is seriously broken on the TS-590 that you used.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>> On 12/01/2013 05:45 AM, Steef wrote:
>> The TS590 is "as bad as they come", on the "up conversion" bands.
>> I have used it in the CQ WW multi radio environment on 10 while extreem
>> conditions on 10 (2011?) and it is useless! No way you can make out even one
>> station on a complete 10 meter band. Just one big noise.
>> Powerspikes 200 w+ on begin transmission!
>> PEP of 10 watt Max in SSB.
>>
>> I would not even consider this radio.
>> Unlike a "EK3" ( K3 Extra Kaal zelf bouw ;-)
>>
>> An EK is the best P.P. ratio possible.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Steef
>>
>>> Op 1 dec. 2013 om 11:25 heeft "PA5MW, Mark"<pa5mw@home.nl> het volgende
>>> geschreven:
>>>
>>> Exactly!
>>> Thank you Chet.
>>>
>>> Based on real live experience feedback here and to my personal mail:
>>>
>>> 1) K3
>>> 2) TS590
>>> 3) TT Eagle
>>>
>>> That seems about the list to choose from.
>>> All three have pos and very few neg issues.
>>>
>>> 73 Mark, PA5MW
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 1-12-2013 3:45, chetmoore wrote:
>>>> The 850S does appear to be a great radio but In this case I don't think
>>>> your
>>>> recommendation would be particularly helpful.
>>>> He needs 12 or 13 of what ever radio he purchases. If one 850s would be
>>>> difficult, finding
>>>> 13 of them would seem to me to be 13 times as difficult.
>>>>
>>>> chet
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|