CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC renamed?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC renamed?
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 06:24:46 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Technically true, but if you look at the USA results and USA teams at least, the vast majority of them involve team leaders who stayed entirely within the confines of the USA for their qualifying scores. For example, W9RE and W2RE were 100% at home stations, and their teammates are from local areas. KE3X (IIRC) did all his operating from stations in suburban DC or central Virginia (and one from Ohio). His teammate is from Virginia.

A couple team leaders do have large DX components to their scores, but so what? Look at their score contributions. One TL was #1 world in one of the ARRL DX tests. It takes some real ability to do that.

73 Rich NN3W

On 10/18/2013 9:19 PM, steve.root@culligan4water.com wrote:
  "The world was divided into regions. Qualifiers were only competing with others in 
their same region in order to qualify."

Except that some of the regions are enormous, thus ignoring the realities of 
propagation.
Except that rules allowed for half of the qualifying scores to happen anywhere 
else on Earth, like the Caribbean.
Except that the rules allow a team leader to pick a partner from anywhere on 
Earth.

The rules sound good in theory but in practice one whole operator and half of 
the other operator have NOTHING to do with any given geographical area.

73 Steve K0SR




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>