CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: NILs hurt

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: NILs hurt
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:09:44 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 9/3/2013 12:06 PM, Patrick Barkey wrote:
If I do not get a solid acknowledgement from another station in a
contest, I DELETE the ENTRY in my logging program.

This begs the question -- at what point in a QSO do we cease requiring
confirmations?  In other words, if you need to copy a confirmation to log a
QSO, then how does the station sending the confirmation know that you've
heard it?

The station sending a confirmation may have no idea that you didn't copy
it.  So should you confirm that you got the confirmation?  Maybe several
rounds of this ack-ing just to be sure?

At some point each contest QSO is built on a trust that each station's
needs are satisfied.  When that trust is there you hit return and log the
QSO.


Its interesting that some demand an explicit QSL or thanks. I remember hearing about how one of the top running stations rarely said thank you or QSL. Instead he simply said "ZD8Z" - which was said to accomplish 1) the acknowledgement need and, 2) the need to identify one's call often.

73 Rich NN3W
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>