CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the wpx a prefix test or dx contest?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the wpx a prefix test or dx contest?
From: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 08:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It is a hybird...like the 10 meter contest.  From FL it is roughly a  50% 
mix.
 
Generally the SS and other contests favor the western US.  The DX  contests 
favor the northeast.  FL is always close but usually not first in  either. 
 
The geographic advantage can be offset, at least in the SSB version by  
working huge quantities of domestic stations, which can be done from the  
southeast.  A huge quantity of "junk" QSOs while throwing in as many 3  
pointers 
as you can offset the NE geographical advantage.
 
I suppose we could change the rules, but doesn't the victory in light of  
the odds make it that much sweeter when it happens?  It's like winning the  
ARRLDX from the SE or a New England station winning SS.  It does happen,  but 
rarely..and when it does, the guy is always a hell of an op.
 
K4XS/KH7XS
n a message dated 5/7/2013 3:02:42 A.M. Coordinated Universal Time,  
rick@nq4i.com writes:
 
I have  been holding this back now for a few weeks...but it is time to bring
it  out...first and foremost, I am not a casual participant in  the
WPXcontests...and I have won my share of them in the past 20 years  or
more...3 times M-M CW and 6 time M-M SSB...along with various and  sundry
single band efforts...

The stated purpose of the WPX contest  as per their web site states:


“The WPX contest is based on an award  offered by CQ Magazine for 
*w*orkingall
*p*refi*x*es. Held on the last  weekend of March (SSB) and May (CW), the
contest draws thousands of entries  from around the world.”

No mention is made that what is really hiding  behind is an actual 
dxcontest.



I offer the following (with  apologies to K1LZ) as material to consider:

2013 Claimed scores WPX  SSB

K1LZ M-S 4726 qso's 1436 prefixes for 21.577 Mil points

NQ4I  M-M 7077 qso's 1456 prefixes for 22,326 Mil points



Obvious from  the get go:

1. The NQ4I team made 2351 MORE qso's than K1LZ.

2.  K1LZ had 3.17 points per qso and NQ4I had 2.16 points per qso

Using the  most basic analysis it is very apparent that K1LZ had a
HUGE advantage due  to geography than NQ4I.

It is also apparent that the rewards associated  by making a large number of
qso's and prefix mults is not afforded to the  NQ4I team.



In order to level the playing field and make the  contest as it appears to
have been designed, a prefix contest and not a dx  contest, I offer the
following change to the WPX rules:

The WPX  contest will consist of 3 points per qso, regardless of the
frequency or  band used. All contacts will receive 3 points per qso, and the
multiplier  used will be determined by the total number of  different
prefixes  worked.



If we reconsider K1LZ's score and NQ4I's score the  following scores would
be resulted:

K1LZ 4726 qso's 1436 prefixes  and 20.359 MIL points

NQ4I 7077 qso's 1456 prefixes and 30.912 MIL  points



Now these score are much more representative of the  efforts of EACH team
and reward both teams accordingly and fairly. By  allowing 3 points per qso,
you eliminate the geographical advantages and  make the contest playing
field level for all.



Respectfully  submitted,



Rick  NQ4I
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>