How about a whole new catagory?
"2X2"
Multi op but only two person.
And the first 24 hrs use one call, then the second 24 hr half start all
over with the second call?
Thoughts?
Joe WB9SB
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 4/1/2013 9:19 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
By the way - this is not my original idea. Others have suggested this
before, particularly Trey N5KO. Given the wider availability of data
and tools, it may be an idea whose time has arrived.
73, Ward N0AX
On 4/1/2013 8:02 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
By publishing the number of hours worked with the score, using
whatever time-on calculation the log-checkers feel is appropriate for
that contest, it would be straightforward for an interested
third-party to calculate score/hr statistics.
Public, validated logs could also be parsed for all sorts of
time-related stats:
- best first 24 hour score
- best second 24 hour score
- best N hour score
- fastest to N points
and so on. It would be the equivalent of baseball's sabermetrics -
what is the analog of "slugging percentage"?
If the data was there and someone cared about the calculation, it
would probably be performed. We might find an interesting way to
compete that doesn't require a new formal category. Or we might
decide that what we already have is good enough and that more
categories don't really change things. Nevertheless, the impact on
the contest sponsors, who have very limited resources, would be minimal.
73, Ward N0AX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|