Interesting indeed, Joe. The best thing I can suggest is to do some
tests. Send a CQ without the spaces, and see who spots you. Move half
a KHz, send CQ again, this time with the extra spaces. What happens?
Alex uses some very sophisticated logic to pick out callsigns. I don't
know the details, so why not give it a try.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 3/1/2013 8:33 AM, Joe wrote:
Thats an interesting question..
How far of goofy spacing can one go and get good readings?
Our club call W9ET is cool, but have found on CW to get less "?" or
requests for repeats we usually have to send it like
W9 E T
with extra spacing after the 9 and the E
I wonder how much if any this is effecting skimmers from spotting the
call?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/28/2013 2:34 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
It's fun to confound the automatons (and their dependents).
73, de Hans, K0HB/K7
On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Ktfrog007@aol.com wrote:
Here's another twist on skimmer accuracy. I've run across one CW
op (not
during contests) who seems to deliberately send his call with
non-standard
character spacing so as to fool the skimmer. He's gets skimmed, but an
incorrect call gets spotted.
I find this weird.
73,
Kermit, AB1J
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|