Lots of dits...not a good thing. When I used KH7XS in WPX Randy told me
that one year, I had the highest amount of variations to my call in other
logs. Everything was sent with the computer so it wasn't a matter of the
fist.
M0OOO has the right idea!
K4XS/KH7XS
In a message dated 2/24/2013 1:46:58 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
ct1boh@gmail.com writes:
For those who want to dive into busting world, it very easy to collect RBN
data available here http://www.reversebeacon.net/raw_data/ and list
variations of correct calls aroud a frequency.
For example 6V7V is just a terrible call on CW. And at high speed...both
skimmer and humans have problems.
Below is all the variations of 6V7V and the % of times it was busted
For example checking http://rate.pileup.ru/vlog.php?call=5U7V will give us
a hint on how busted packet pile-ups develop.
Skimmer of someone busted 6V7V into 5U7V. All of a sudden a pileup builds
on 6V7V side from 17:56 until 18:09 with all the Assisted stations jumping
to the new mult without listening.
The poor fellows at 6V7V awake to a stream of dupes, and the Assisted guys
to a Busted call with the correspondent penaly 1+3 QSOs when log checking
is done...
6V7V 6V7U 23.6% 6V7C 19.3% BV7V 14.5% 6V6V 13.8% 5U7V 3.6% 6V7X 2.2%
6W7V 1.8% D47V 1.8% BU7V 1.5% 6V7T 1.5% 6V7A 1.5% 6V8V 1.5% 6V7Z
1.1%
6V7S 1.1% 5V7V 1.1% 6U7V 0.7% 6V4V 0.7% 6U7U 0.7% B47V 0.7% 6V6U 0.7%
7V7V 0.7% 6W7X 0.4% 6VZV 0.4% 6VBV 0.4% 6V7Q 0.4% 6474 0.4% 6V7 0.4%
6V7M 0.4% 6V2V 0.4% 6V7Y 0.4% BV6V 0.4% BV8V 0.4% 6V5V 0.4% EV7V 0.4%
6V7VQ 0.4% 6V 0.4% 6V7W 0.4%
--
José Nunes
CONTEST CT1BOH - http://www.qsl.net/ct1boh
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|