CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:49:15 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There was a KT6 station that was always spotted as T6...which is obviously pretty rare. This was happening because of some strange spacing the guy was using in his CQ messages. This was not in a contest and I wonder if it was done on purpose.

Mike W0MU

On 2/20/2013 10:50 AM, Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote:
W5OV writes: During a contest, the RBN continually and repeatedly, ad
infinitum, makes the same errors over and over and over which fills the
bandmaps with useless stuff.

I guess Bob argument is biased on EK3LR events.  There are less than 100
wrong spots from USA Skimmers.  One would also expect similar EK9CT errors
but there are only 5.  No EK1ZZ or EK9NW.  Only 16 errors of EW3LPL.  Only
one EU Skimmer G0KTN made EK3LR single error out of 330 proper spots.
Average human error rate on CW is around 3 %.  Not for Z6/S56A!

I suspect K3LR is using full break-in at legal power which distorts CW
envelope causing random timing errors.  We can learn a lot from RBN!

Note to W3WN & W2UP:  We learnt a lot about proper coding since Alfred Vail
"invented" Morse code based on English language stats J  I like Pascal.

LP MMM S56A

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>