I love this soooo much even if the ARRL should not adopt it, would there
be some other group willing to manage it? So we could do it anyway?
Could you imagine, suddenly six hours from the end the band is all alive
again!
joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/10/2013 1:07 PM, Joe wrote:
Now That I LOVE!
The last 6 hours of the FULL SS make a SSS Sweep Stakes Sprint.
Such a cool idea, especially for those that can no longer physically
do a single op 24 test. or those that physically could, but for some
reason or another whatever the reason is, they could invest 6 hours.
You do not know how much I love that idea!
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/10/2013 9:43 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
No, but there *might* be a correlation if limited-time competition
categories were offered, perhaps focused on Sunday operating
periods. A "6-hour Sunday" class might add some activity in the dead
zone, particularly as the age of SS participants continues to rise.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 2/9/2013 8:59 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
We seemed to have gotten well off the original topic which was a
substantial drop in participation in the contest and what things we
could do to get more people to participate.
Sunday afternoon, lack of rate was mentioned as reason that
discouraged some.
I am not sure if there is any correlation between changing the
length of the contest and increasing participation.
Mike W0MU
On 2/9/2013 9:14 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
If you don't want to operate during the full length of the contest,
what does it matter what the actual length of the contest is? If you
only want to operate on Saturday, then do just that, etc.
If you are in it mostly for fun (like I usually am), then you operate
when you wish. If you want to be competitive, you'd do whatever it
takes to be competitive if that means operating the maximum time
allowed by the rules.
73, Zack W9SZ
On 2/8/13, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
Not only NO but HELL NO!
Bring more players, not less operating time.
On Friday, February 8, 2013, Timothy Coker wrote:
Shorten it... better for family time, less Sunday boredom, etc.
I think this idea has something for everyone. I know a lot of the
older
guys who no longer choose to stay in the chair due to ailments. I
know a
number of the younger guys who choose to not stay in the chair
due to
family time. The third is the shear boredom factor of a one
contact per
station rule.
I could go with the break period too... maybe two hours like NAQP? I
personally like the decision making involved with when to break.
Plus we
can take a walk, sleep, eat dinner with our loved ones, etc.
73,
Tim/ N6WIN.
On Feb 6, 2013 12:27 PM, "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com
<javascript:;>>
wrote:
On 02/06/2013 11:42 AM, RT Clay wrote:
Yes, the fix is simple: shorten the overall length to 24
hours. Still
keep a required off time of 6 hours. > The off time is
important to
allow
stations in different parts of the country to choose the best
times to
operate (day/night). That is particularly important for small
stations.
Choosing when to take off is also > part of SS strategy.
I could almost warm up to this. Except I would say get rid of the
required
off time. Go 24 hours if that's what you want.
With 24 hours total the exact start time doesn't matter either
as far
as
propagation- it covers a full day.
0000Z to 2359Z . That should make Sunday more interesting - it
will be
the
first opportunity for significant high band propagation, and there
would
be
only one night-time opportunity.
I'm sure the average qso speed in SS has gone up over the years-
computer
logging/etc, plus the exchange used to be longer. So it makes
sense to
make
the whole thing shorter.
That is absolutely true. I have listened to recordings from the
1970's.
Much slower. That was the way to pick up the hoards of
newly-licensed
General's who could barely do 13 WPM.
Yes, records get messed up. But they already get messed up
every time
a
new section is added.
Agreed.
If SS is shortened, I could even warm up to grandfathering the old
records
and starting new records.
73,
Steve, N2IC
______________________________**_________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|