CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted / Non Assisted

To: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted / Non Assisted
From: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:45:55 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
#2 is still not so easy to catch.

What is to stop an SO2R from lining up a series of mults on another
band, then after a band change scooping them all up.  While he is busy
running the second band, he can then use the (now free) first radio to
line up mults on a third band...  Repeat and rinse as necessary.


Tom - VE3CX




On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Here are my thoughts...
>
> 1)  Make one unlimited single operator category. Someone in that category can 
> use all the technology that’s available such as packet spots, skimmer, SO2R 
> etc...   I think that would probably eliminate all the cheating except for 
> someone running high power or claiming single operator when they have a 
> relief operator. Those two things are hard to catch.
>
> 2) Keep a traditional single operator category. None of the technology I 
> mentioned above is allowed. Just one radio and one operator. That would put 
> more strategy back in the single-op category to decide which band to be on to 
> maximize your score. I also think a category like this might be helpful to 
> draw people into contesting. Plus those who have left contesting because they 
> don’t have the resources to be competitive might become interested again. 
> Have maybe a 5 minute rule for band changes. That way you can catch people 
> that are trying to cheat.
>
> Jeff KU8E
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>