Rick, I'm well aware of that, which is why I contacted Directors who
contest, to try to get the issue before the Board. My question really
goes to why the question has to wait for a semi-annual Board meeting,
when a Board committee could vote on such minor matters by e-mail "as
needed." You seem to be well patched in - do you know what they decided,
if anything?
On second thought, I'm copying Sean - he should know.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 1/25/2013 12:00 PM, Rick Lindquist, WW1ME wrote:
Pete, the CAC is what it says - "advisory." It's also comprised of
volunteers. The CAC reports its findings and recommendations to the Board of
Directors, and the board decides (or not). This puts the decision-making in
the hands of individuals who have been elected by the ARRL membership.
73, Rick, WW1ME
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Pete Smith N4ZR
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
What Rich says is correct. I would just add that the ARRL 10 and 160
contests are severely anachronistic in this respect. Nobody is suggesting
that assistance be allowed for "pure" single-ops, but surely there should be
a SOA category in these contests. That there is not dates back to the
earliest days of DX clusters. To my knowledge, nobody has advanced a reason
for keeping the status quo.
I have been in correspondence with the CAC and various directors about this,
and one told me that action might be taken in the January ARRL Board
meeting, which has just taken place. Why it requires a decision at that
level is beyond me, but that's what we have. Now waiting for detailed
minutes to learn what, if anything, was done.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 1/25/2013 8:51 AM, Richard DiDonna NN3W wrote:
Usually if it says nothing, the assumption is that you must classify
yourself as multi-single as the single operator rules have language about
the -operator- doing all of the activity.
ARRL 160 and ARRL 10 do not have separate assisted categories -
necessitating that assisted ops enter as multi single entries.
73 Rich NN3W
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
----- Reply message -----
From: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Fri, Jan 25, 2013 7:30 am
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
If a contest's rules say nothing about Assisted operation, does that
mean it's allowed without restriction?
Note that Single-Op has no uniform definition. For example, in the
ARRL RTTY Roundup, Single-Ops cannot be Assisted, while in the CQ WPX
RTTY everyone can operate Assisted.
73,
Kermit (Ken) AB1J
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|