Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest - What's It For?

[W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>]

Because CQ-Contest is not going to resolve these issues.  I agree with 
Tom about the DC thing.  I should not have got sucked into this argument 
yet again.
Mike W0MU

On 1/10/2013 1:28 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 02:30, Tom Frenaye wrote:
>
> > We had the discussion about Washington DC as a multiplier in December 
> > 2012, and in August 2012, and before that every year or two.
> > The proponents (or opponents) can contact the contest sponsors and 
> > make their case for change.
> > Let's move on to something else.
>
> It seems to me that the purpose of cq-contest is to
> encourage and facilitate discussion of topics relevant
> to contesters and contesting.
>
> The fact that some issues are discussed repeatedly is
> often due to them being both relevant and unresolved.
> Why can't these discussions be encouraged?
>
> CQ-Contest is the best forum we have, worldwide, for
> reviewing contesting issues, and it serves equally well
> in bringing them to the attention to contest sponsors.
>
> List members who have no interest in specific issues
> need have no complaints, as they are free to ignore
> them.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest