CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:37:45 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Here, here!

Add CQ WW RTTY to the list as well.

73,

Paul, N8HM
Washington, DC

On 8/10/2012 4:24 PM, Mike Tessmer wrote:
> With this talk about new sections/multipliers, I think what NN3W may have 
> hinted at is:
>
> Why is DC not a multiplier in the NAQP?
>
> I asked this same question a few years ago and got exactly one answer that 
> implied that adding DC might render all NAQP records meaningless, or 
> something to that effect.  That's a very weak argument in that having someone 
> show up from DC would have no more effect on any record than having someone 
> show up from Greenland or any Caribbean or Central American country.  (Yet 
> we'd all be saying "Great to see some DX activity!"}
>
> So I'll toss it out there again:
>
>   - Why not add DC as a mult in NAQP?
>   - What would be a valid reason not to?
>
> Perhaps one of the NAQP managers might chime in.
>
>
> 73, Mike K9NW
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>