Filipe, i can bet it would,my friend!
But i assume,if so,some of the people wouldn't be so persistent qualifying for
the event!
Plus...it leaves no room for further speculation ....who are using second
op.,skimmer,pclx...or any kind of assistance?!!
Just thinking out loud :)
73,Mladen YT6W
________________________________
From: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
To: Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov@yahoo.com>
Cc: Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>; "cq-contest@contesting.com"
<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules
Mladen, good point, that would be a very interesting competition :)))
Filipe CT1ILT - CR6K
2012/5/21 Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov@yahoo.com>
Therefore, WRTC should be Single Op. event (WRSOC).
>Put your SO1,2,3 or 4R setup and show your skills!
>Simple as that....
>
>So one must brew coffee for himself :)
>
>73, Mladen YT6W
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 9:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Big change in WRTC rules
>
>
>>A single individual can have a lot more effect in a M/S operation than in a
>M/M operation. And a M/2 with two operators is a lot more like a single op
>effort than a M/2 with six operators.
>
>
>If you brew coffee for team, you get same points (in all multi classes) ...
>
>73 Timo OH1NOA
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Regards/Cumprimentos,
Filipe Lopes CT1ILT aka CR6K
http://www.rep.pt/ct1ilt
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|