CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [AOCC] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments to AmateurRadi

To: <n2ic@arrl.net>, "Paul" <paul@w8aef.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [AOCC] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments to AmateurRadioCommunications
From: "Sam Fry" <samsadventure@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:14:43 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yes, it think the responses need to be well thought out, and well written.
Also, my thought was that anyone or any club who is/has been active in any 
type of emergency activity would be given more weight. So, maybe we do both 
individual responses and club responses!
Sam
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
To: "Paul" <paul@w8aef.com>
Cc: "Sam Fry" <samsadventure@gmail.com>; "AOCC" <aocc@mailman.qth.net>; 
"AOCC" <aocc@mailman.qth.net>; "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:05
Subject: Re: [AOCC] FCC Seeks Comments on Impediments to 
AmateurRadioCommunications


> On 04/03/2012 11:47 AM, Paul wrote:
>> This is a government bureaucracy.
>>
>> Assume that a secretary opens the mail (or looks at email) and checks off 
>> the
>> 'for' or 'against' columns on his/her form, numbers matter.
>
> For ? Against ?
>
> This is not a notice of rulemaking. It's a request for comments on a 
> number of open-ended questions.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>