To: | "Yannick \(XV4Y\)" <yannick.devos@online.fr>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB (CQ WPX) : How were condx ? |
From: | "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Reply-to: | Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:16:09 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I have two (temporary) conclusions from this : - On the morning perhaps the path is not fully SP or LP and usually NA stations are bearing to JA, not me, making things harder to understand. - Around 1 meter under my antenna I have a roof which frame is in metal. Length is around 10m... If heading 330°the main dimension is parallel to the antenna. Heading 015° perhaps the frame act as a parasitic element and modify the radiation pattern...>>>>>> Sounds like either one of your thoughts, or perhaps both of your thoughts, are reasonable conclusions. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio, Jim Cassidy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio, Bill Parry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB (CQ WPX) : How were condx ?, David Gilbert |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL-DX SSB : How were condx ?, Mueller, David ENG2 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |