Good day, everyone:
I think using this as an opportunity for education is the correct
approach. If this is a new contester
or a casual participant, he or she may be completely unaware of the
issue. Let's give them the
benefit of the doubt and be polite and helpful!
73,
Mark, KD4D
On 2/24/2012 1:24 PM, Shane Mattson-->K1ZR wrote:
> As I read through this I checked my calendar to see if today was April 1st.
> If this is this really happening it's grounds for DQ IMO.
>
> Shane K1ZR
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tree
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:03 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Isn't the contest over?
>
> Seems there is a station sending out e-mails asking people to correct his
> exchange for the ARRL DX Contest. Seems that perhaps the power he sent was
> too high.
>
> I am AMAZED that anyone in radiosport thinks this is a good idea. A ham
> radio contest is supposed to be all about a two way exchange of information
> on the radio. If you sent a certain power level during the contest - that
> is the "correct" thing for people to have logged.
>
> Anyone who feels that the internet is part of this game should be DQ'd.
> The contest ended last Sunday.
>
> If you get such an e-mail - I encourage you to do two things:
>
> - not make the change. The log checker will notice what most people logged.
> - use this as an opportunity to educate the person sending you the e-mail
>
> 73 Tree N6TR
> tree@kkn.net
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|