CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating

To: Carol Richards <n2mm@comcast.net>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating
From: "Collins, Graham" <CollinG@navcanada.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:00:52 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Carol (and all),

The intent of your comment is understood.

However, I think it is bit misplaced. 

There are those who operate QRP by choice, they thrive on the challenge and are 
the better for their successes in doing so.

There are those who have little choice but to use indoor or otherwise 
compromised antennas but do so and simply get on the air and participate.

In either case, these operators get as much out of competing as anyone else in 
spite of what others may see as reasons for taking up another hobby such as 
knitting.


Cheers es 73 Graham ve3gtc




-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Carol Richards
Sent: October 15, 2011 07:41
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cheating

To add on to Han's idea...the penalty for blatant cheating should be one year 
of operating contests running qrp with an indoor antenna. Now that is humility 
!!!!



Carol
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>