Hi folks
An additional comment:
I think would be not recommendable to stimulate regional groups to act as
fiscal for any kind of contest. This could generate unwanted dispute,
behaviors and accusations without sufficient proves. so useless arguments
that could never be used by the Committee for the necessary penalties.
Frustration fights and deterioration of friend relationship in contest
community are going to be the bottom end results.
Regards
Oms PY5EG
Enviado pelo meu aparelho BlackBerry da Claro
-----Original Message-----
From: py5eg@iesa.com.br
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:13:48
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-To: py5eg@iesa.com.br
Subject: Power measurement
Hi Randy and all
I'm reading the mail on power cheating and would like put some cents on the
subject:
- It is very difficult to prove that some station is operating over the limits
and how much of excess of power is being used
- In several areas to be controlled the technology has developed devices to
register the measurement of those values - i.e speed tachometer - energy values
etc
- It is not difficult to have a power digital controller with digital
registration for a period of 48 hours, forcing the top and record players to
have this registration available for the contest organizers.
- In other side we must recognize that power cheating is one among several ways
to enlarge results using not allowed practices - SO with more than one operator
- cluster support - multiple local receiving setup - M/S and M/2 with
additional transmitted signals - Multi location in Multiop category - rubber
cheating - log adjustment after contest i etc
- I understand that we should fight with similar strength against all those bad
practices
Oms. PY5EG
Enviado pelo meu aparelho BlackBerry da Claro
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|