To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Web SDR's and 'Cheating' |
From: | Geoffrey Way <wayg@cape-vision.com> |
Date: | Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:44:53 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
SDR's aren't a bad thing, we should just take care about how we make them available via the internet... How would it work if users were advised that what they are hearing is intentionally delayed by a random length of time anywhere between 30 to 90 seconds? Wouldn't that allow us to encourage other listeners without fueling unethical behavior? -- KA1IOR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Accuracy of VY2TT CQWW CW 2010 Log Checking Report, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2011 Pa QSO Party Plans, Bud Trench |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Web SDR's and 'Cheating', Doug Renwick |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Web SDR's and 'Cheating', David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |