To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & Activity (Was: Intended consequences) |
From: | Ktfrog007@aol.com |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:57:33 -0400 (EDT) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Why is the WPX-RTTY 30 hours? 73, Kermit, AB1J In a message dated 7/20/2011 12:12:44 A.M. GMT Standard Time, kq2m@kq2m.com writes: Hi Chris, When the single op time limit was increased to 36 hours, activity DID EXPLODE and rates and activity stayed at a much higher level on Sunday than before when the time limit was 30 hours. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WPX & Activity (Was: Intended consequences), Bob Shohet KQ2M |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences), KL7RA |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & Activity (Was: Intended consequences), Yuri Blanarovich |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WPX & activity (Was: intended consequences), KL7RA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |