CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] RE : Intended Consequences

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] RE : Intended Consequences
From: "Jeffrey Clarke" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:37:27 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
KQ2M wrote

 

"Another important change was made a not long after.  The mid-West and West
Coast ops 

and others like myself felt hat it was unfair to work US for mult credit and
no points."

 

 

Bob, I remember back in the day when this rule was in place K8MR purposely
worked only zero point QSO's to demonstrate how silly this rule was. See 

http://www.cqwpx.com/searchbycall.htm?cl=k8mr
<http://www.cqwpx.com/searchbycall.htm?cl=k8mr&order=contestdate&submit=Go>
&order=contestdate&submit=Go   His 3 efforts of 0 points were actually
published in the contest results.

 

 

Jeff KU8E

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] RE : Intended Consequences, Jeffrey Clarke <=