To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Equalized scores |
From: | Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k0rc@citlink.net |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:38:15 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
That idea was rejected because they're not in alphabetical order. Even then, the Z's would start complaining that the A's had an unfair advantage. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN On 6/29/2011 10:54 PM, George Fremin III wrote: > In early June of 1993 this same topic came up on this same > list. I will resubmit my contribution to this thread. > > http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/1993-06/msg00020.html > > Fixed - equalized scoring... should make everyone happy. > > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Crowne Plaza hotel for Hamvention 2012, Mark Ketchell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] SDR-IQ or QS1R baseband I/Q file for CQWW CW or WPX CW?, Gerry Hull |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Equalized scores, George Fremin III |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] distances, Rick Dougherty NQ4I |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |