I think what he was asking is if it was possible to run two single band
entries using the same club callsign. I see many issues with this. I
believe using separate calls is the only way to do this.
On 3/3/2011 11:03 PM, w5ov@w5ov.com wrote:
> Yes.
>
> This is called "Multi-Two" or "Multi-Operator, Two Transmitter".
>
> Here's what you "mist" (sic):
>
> 2.3.2.Multioperator, Two Transmitter:
> 2.3.2.1.A maximum of two transmitted signals at any given time, on
> different bands.
>
> 2.3.2.2.Each transmitter is limited to 6 band changes (maximum) in any
> clock hour. Unused band changes from radio one may not be transferred to
> radio two.
>
> 2.3.2.2.1.The clock hour is from zero through 59 minutes.
>
> 2.3.2.2.2.Band changes are defined so that, for example, a change from 20
> meters to 40 meters and then back to 20 meters constitutes two band
> changes.
>
> 2.3.2.2.3.Violation of the 6-band change rule or improper logging will
> result in an entry reclassification to the Multioperator Multitransmitter
> class.
>
> 2.3.2.3.Both transmitters may work any and all stations; the second
> transmitter is not limited to working new multipliers only. However, a
> station may only be worked once per band regardless of which transmitter
> is used.
>
> 2.3.2.4.Each of the two transmitters must keep a separate, chronological
> log for the entire contest period.
>
> 2.3.2.5.The Cabrillo log must indicate which transmitter made each QSO in
> this category.
>
>
>> Contesters,
>>
>> Just wandering about this one:
>> Is it possible for two single operators, lets say one SO on 40 meter and
>> the
>> other SO on 20 meter, to use the same club call sign during the upcomming
>> ARRL International DX contest?
>> I guess there could be some problems when submitting the logs to the
>> robot.
>> There is a good chance the robot will only use the last uploaded log and
>> disregard the log which was oploaded first since both logs are submitted
>> with the same call sign.
>>
>> Can't find anthing in the rules about this one (yes, I have read all 3(!)
>> sets of rules on the ARRL website;-)) but I could have mist it.
>>
>> Best 73,
>>
>> Maarten PD2R
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> dldledememt
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|