Luc,
You are in our log 7 times, 5 of which are valid QSOs with your station. We
logged PW7T:
2 times on 80 and 20
1 time on 40
1 time on 15 and
1 time on 10
That's 5 GOOD Qs logged and 2 Dupes. We did NOT work you on 160. I
understand what you're saying, but fail to see the problem in our case
running Multi-Two with an average of duping you once per station during the
weekend.
We'll be particularly careful not to inconvenience you in future contests.
73'....Fred, WW4LL
Worse case scenario is we duped PW7T ops 3 times total. I don't see the big
deal.
On 2/21/11 9:33 AM, "Luc PY8AZT" <py8azt@dxbrasil.net> wrote:
> Barry,
>
> I lot of guys worked a Skimmer Phatom _GW7T_ (and some variations)
> last weekend - no better way to find out non-Assisted Claimmig
> Stations. I got 205 dupes out 4k QSOs, could be more If I didnt just
> ignore some of them after 3rd dupe QSO. I worked WW4LL 9 times.
>
> 73, Luc
> __
> PW7T Team member
> WRTC.2010 Brazilian Team Leader
> PY8AZT (also PT7AG, PX8C, ZZ8Z, ZY7C)
> LABRE, ARRL, CWJF & Fortaleza DX Group Member
>
> Visit our websites:
> PW7T: http://www.pw7t.net
> DXBrasil: http://www.dxbrasil.net
>
>
> 2011/2/20 Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
>>
>> Got my first taste of the RBN at K0RF this weekend. Maybe K1TTT can do
>> an analysis, but it seemed that the Skimmer missed lots of dits at the
>> beginning of calls, as well as picking up stray letters. My favorite
>> call was that M/M from Argentina, LW3LPL :.)
>> Barry W2UP
>>
>> --
>>
>> Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|