Ken,
Thanks for helping in explanation with proper English words.
73s, Harry RA3AUU
11.02.2011, в 7:45, Ken Widelitz написал(а):
> Actually, these new rules make a lot of sense. The requirements are
> minimally intrusive. Much less so than a referee in the shack.
>
> What serious competitor doesn't use computer logging? What serious
> competitor doesn't have the computer tracking frequency so as to
> switch
> filters and antennas?
>
> Given the reverse beacon network, a station claiming to be running
> low/QRP
> power can be tracked almost continuously throughout the contest. Given
> antenna, transmission line and elevation information, a model can be
> created
> so the low/QRP power station can be compared to relatively nearby
> other
> stations. If one station's signal is received consistently better at
> various
> RBNs, adjusting for what the model predicts, that is a strong
> indication
> that they may not actually be running low/QRP power.
>
> It is a strong deterrent to claiming low/QRP power when QRO.
>
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|