CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use?

To: ua9cdc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use?
From: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:00:06 -0600 (CST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That would be sufficient.

But if the reply is "NO" or "LATER" or something like that, let it go.  
Continuing to ask becomes counterproductive.

73


Jan 26, 2011 05:52:42 AM, ua9cdc@gmail.com wrote:

Or would "PSE QSY 3510" be sufficient?

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Yuri" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use?


> So, Rob - if I would ask you really politely (on CW) :
> "DR ROB CAN U QSY TO xx MHZ NOW PSE WE NEED U ON xx"?
> Would it be polite enough for you?
> Just curious.
>
> 73 Yuri VE3DZ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "HK3CW" <
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Mult passing: is it okay to use?
>
>
>> Hello Guy,
>>
>> There's not really "a best way", all a contester has to do (as with all
>> human relationships) is be polite.
>>
>> If I feel like I'm being "corraled" into qsying I won't move an inch.
>> Contesters often forget they are dealing with human beings and when I'm
>> treated like a "multipler lump" I won't provide my multiplier. As simple
>> as
>> that.
>>
>> 73 de Rob HK3CW
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>