CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SP Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SP Rules
From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Reply-to: vr2bg@harts.org.hk
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:02:13 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Like most contest rules - which I note seem to be mostly written in USA 
- the SPTBDC seems to adopt the same look-for-the-bomb instead of 
look-for-the-bomber approach to airline safety.

These contests also seem to presume that what the "bombs" are called is 
known to all.

Too much reference to specific things that cannot be used instead of 
what those things are used for that is really what should be said is not 
allowed to be done.

Maybe is okay for domestic consumption, but it seems even that audience 
is having a bit of a struggle understanding what was meant.

73, ex-VR2BG/p.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>