CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live th

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live the King
From: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I just don't like the fact that contesting had gotten to the point where 
technology does everything. Now you don't even have to copy CW or tune the 
band, the computer will do it all for you.  I would guess that sooner or later 
"unassisted" will allow for it.
 
73s John AA5JG

--- On Wed, 7/28/10, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote:


From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long live 
the King
To: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@yahoo.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 4:34 PM



Why is that?  Why would you care how anyone finds you?

How will you even be able to tell whether anyone finds you via spinning a knob 
or via CW Skimmer?  If anything, Skimmer spots are more evenly distributed in 
time compared with current packet/cluster spots that tend to result in 
congregated callers.

Are you worried about having to compete against folks using Skimmer?  If so, 
simply operate unassisted.

I don't get it ... what am I missing?

73,
Dave   AB7E


On 7/28/2010 6:49 AM, John Geiger wrote: 

Right now I just "tolerate" SSB contesting, but skimmer might lead me to become 
mainly a SSB contester.



      
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>